888-776-0942 from 8 AM - 10 PM ET
NEW YORK , Aug. 16, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs determined that certain "no hair wrap" claims made by SharkNinja Operating, LLC for its Shark Vertex corded vacuum and Vertex Lightweight cordless stick vacuum were supported. NAD recommended that Shark discontinue other "no hair wrap" claims for its Vertex vacuums and discontinue or modify certain "no hair wrap" claims for its Navigator Pet Pro vacuum. NAD also recommended that Shark discontinue claims related to the superior hair pick-up ability of Vertex vacuums and the ability of the Vertex corded vacuum to pick up all debris in a single pass.
These claims, which appear in Shark's 30-minute infomercial for the Vertex corded vacuum, product pages on Shark's website, and/or on product packaging, were challenged by Dyson, Inc., maker of competing vacuum cleaners.
Shark's Vertex vacuums feature patented technology that Shark calls "PowerFins," which are specially designed flaps attached to the brushroll in place of traditional bristles to prevent the wrapping of hair. Shark's Navigator vacuum, which has bristles, uses a patented bristle guard-and-comb design that helps to separate hair from the brushroll so that the hair doesn't tighten around the brushroll when vacuuming.
NAD determined that, in the context of the challenged infomercial, "hair wrap" is reasonably understood as the wrapping and entanglement of hair around traditional bristle brushrolls that can accumulate and affect vacuum performance. Further, NAD found that "no hair wrap" claims in Shark's infomercial, along with two product demonstrations, convey the message that:
In addition, NAD concluded that the product pages and packaging for the Vertex and Navigator vacuums communicate that all strands of hair are removed from the Shark brushrolls during their normal operation, and that the products can pick up pet hair and long hair during typical cleaning activity on either carpet or hard floors.
NAD concluded that Vertex testing reliably shows that the Vertex brushroll will not incur hair wrap when picking up long hair or pet hair off carpet or hard floors. Therefore, with respect to the Vertex vacuums, NAD determined that Shark had a reasonable basis for its express claims:
However, NAD recommended that these claims be discontinued regarding Shark's Navigator vacuum because NAD found that Shark's Navigator testing did not test the brushroll under all conditions covered by the claims. Alternatively, NAD suggested that Shark could modify the claims to limit them to the pick-up of long hair on carpet only.
Finally, NAD determined that Shark did not substantiate the reasonably conveyed message that no hair will be wrapped around the Vertex corded vacuum brushroll immediately after cleaning, regardless of duration. Therefore, NAD recommended that Shark:
Alternatively, NAD recommended that Shark modify such claims to make clear the conditions under which the consumer would experience the absence of any hair wrap on the Vertex (e.g., clearly and conspicuously disclose the actual run time of the vacuums so that consumers understand that additional run time is needed before the clean brushroll is achieved).
NAD determined that Shark's infomercial for its Vertex corded vacuum reasonably conveys to consumers a message that the Vertex vacuum provides better hair pick-up from the floor to the dust cup versus all traditional bristle brushroll vacuums. Because NAD found that Shark's testing was not a good fit for this comparative claim, NAD recommended that Shark:
NAD concluded that several testimonials in the Vertex infomercial, along with product depictions showing the Vertex vacuum picking up all food and debris in a single pass, reasonably convey a message that the Vertex vacuum picks up 100% of food, hair, and debris shown in the infomercial in a single pass, whether on a hard floor or carpet. Because Shark did not provide support for this message, NAD recommended that Shark discontinue the express claims:
And modify the infomercial to avoid conveying the implied claims that:
NAD noted that nothing in its decision prohibits Shark from making truthful and accurate claims regarding the Vertex vacuum's ability to pick up food, hair, or any other debris for which Shark has a reasonable basis of support.
In its advertiser statement, Shark stated that it "agrees to comply with NAD's recommendations." The advertiser further stated that although it "does not agree with all of NAD's findings, as a strong supporter of voluntary self-regulation, it accepts NAD's decision."
All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive.
About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs is where businesses turn to enhance consumer trust and consumers are heard. The non-profit organization creates a fairer playing field for businesses and a better experience for consumers through the development and delivery of effective third-party accountability and dispute resolution programs. Embracing its role as an independent organization since the restructuring of the Council of Better Business Bureaus in June 2019 , BBB National Programs today oversees more than a dozen leading national industry self-regulation programs, and continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-directed marketing, and privacy. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.
About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division (NAD) of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. NAD reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.
Cision Distribution 888-776-0942 from 8 AM - 9 PM ET